Re: Re: Feedback requested: Impending changes to RunListener

Sorry

<dependency>
  <groupId>com.github.stephenc.jcip</groupId>
  <artifactId>jcip-annotations</artifactId>
  <version>1.0-1</version>
</dependency>


On 13 February 2013 10:51, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]
> wrote:

> To allow for the removal of licensing concerns, I have clean-room reverse
> engineered the jcip-annotations as well:
> https://github.com/stephenc/jcip-annotations
>
> Should be available from Central in the next 1-8 hours
>
> <dependency>
>   <groupId>com.github.stephenc</groupId>
>   <artifactId>jcip-annotations</artifactId>
>   <version>1.0-1</version>
> </dependency>
>
> This should be a drop in replacement for
>
> <dependency>
>     <groupId>net.jcip</groupId>
>     <artifactId>jcip-annotations</artifactId>
>     <version>1.0</version>
> </dependency>
>
> But if it isn't please let me know and I can fix and roll a 1.0-2
>
>
> On 13 February 2013 09:17, Stephen Connolly <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 13 February 2013 01:17, Kevin Cooney <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:14 PM, tibord47 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> **
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> ok, so in that case the standard javax annotations cannot be used.
>>>>
>>>> Other options are jcip and proprietary one.
>>>>
>>> There are a few other options that were suggested. I've summarized them
>>> all here:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OeE5OUKgtkKHeQuA7bKldBTk-yQ83bH6BHokwifCPrE/edit#
>>>
>>> Feel free to add comments if I missed something. If you don't have a
>>> Google account (or even if you do) feel free to continue to comment here.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I vote for jcip since the license allows us to use a dependency.
>>>>
>>> Stephen indicated a concern with the jcip-annotations license. Hopefully
>>> he (or someone else with a concern) can explain why the license is
>>> problematic.
>>>
>>
>> I indicated that there may be a concern with the license and you'd want
>> to check.
>>
>> We had (at former employers) an issue with the findbugs annotations
>> (LGPL), so I created https://github.com/stephenc/findbugs-annotations as
>> a clean-room reverse engineered implementation (Apache License v2) of the
>> same annotations specification.
>>
>> We weren't using the jcip-annotations, so those were not subject to the
>> lawyers reviewing.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> -- Kevin
>>>
>>>
>>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/junit/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/junit/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/