Re: Re: Feedback requested: Impending changes to RunListener
Stephen Connolly <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.junit.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+nPnMy35KgFK0kZSruKqRAvH7jMMWRT1Kpvxw2_XS5oEDQUcw@mail.gmail.com> |
To allow for the removal of licensing concerns, I have clean-room reverse
engineered the jcip-annotations as well:
https://github.com/stephenc/jcip-annotations
Should be available from Central in the next 1-8 hours
<dependency>
<groupId>com.github.stephenc</groupId>
<artifactId>jcip-annotations</artifactId>
<version>1.0-1</version>
</dependency>
This should be a drop in replacement for
<dependency>
<groupId>net.jcip</groupId>
<artifactId>jcip-annotations</artifactId>
<version>1.0</version>
</dependency>
But if it isn't please let me know and I can fix and roll a 1.0-2
On 13 February 2013 09:17, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 13 February 2013 01:17, Kevin Cooney <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:14 PM, tibord47 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> ok, so in that case the standard javax annotations cannot be used.
>>>
>>> Other options are jcip and proprietary one.
>>>
>> There are a few other options that were suggested. I've summarized them
>> all here:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OeE5OUKgtkKHeQuA7bKldBTk-yQ83bH6BHokwifCPrE/edit#
>>
>> Feel free to add comments if I missed something. If you don't have a
>> Google account (or even if you do) feel free to continue to comment here.
>>
>>>
>>> I vote for jcip since the license allows us to use a dependency.
>>>
>> Stephen indicated a concern with the jcip-annotations license. Hopefully
>> he (or someone else with a concern) can explain why the license is
>> problematic.
>>
>
> I indicated that there may be a concern with the license and you'd want to
> check.
>
> We had (at former employers) an issue with the findbugs annotations
> (LGPL), so I created https://github.com/stephenc/findbugs-annotations as
> a clean-room reverse engineered implementation (Apache License v2) of the
> same annotations specification.
>
> We weren't using the jcip-annotations, so those were not subject to the
> lawyers reviewing.
>
>
>>
>> -- Kevin
>>
>>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/junit/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/junit/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/