Re: jxta download revamp
James Todd <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:28:34 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.jxta.user,gmane.comp.java.jxta.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
BTW, help w/ crafting the HTML, etc is *hugely* appreciated. - james -- James Todd :: blogs.sun.com/gonzo | weblogs.java.net/blog/gonzo MyJXTA :: use it - learn it - do it Java == platform independence XML == application independence JXTA == network independence Secure End-to-End Computing James Todd wrote: > > Hey - > > I took a little swing at revamping the JXTA Download page yesterday, > starting > w/ the nightlies: > > http://download.jxta.org/build/nightly > > I'd like to remove extraneous build artifacts and have identified the > following: > > platform :: jxtaSwing.jar, jxtaextservice.war, jxtaext.jar > > note: jxatext.jar and it's dependencies are available in jxta-lib-*.zip > > I need confirmation to the above and have registered issue #1336: > > http://platform.jxta.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1366 > > Agreeing or disagreeing via email is a fine means to hash this one out, > but > I would like to close this issue in the spirit of making the JXTA > downloads > beyone easy. I have more in store down the road. > > In stepping back a bit it has been suggested the resulting page contains > too much info, namely like links to project home page, maven reports and > extraneous jnlp files. > > Taking this into account I have boiled out all of the above to a general > "build" page and have uploaded it to: > > http://download.jxta.org/build > > This page can be viewed as a JXTA build Rosetta Stone and is intentionally > consistent in format across projects. With this page in place and given it > sits above the nightly and release pages we should be able to remove all > links but the actual downloads on the nightly (and release) page. > > Some issues do remain (eg better space utilage) but I would appreciate > some > quick feedback, pub or private, as to is this helping or not and if > not, what > would you suggest > > much appreciated, > > - james >