Newbie: Which startup docs to use?
keel.jsmit-4WVpuZSLeeJWk0Htik3J/[email protected] Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:28:16 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.keel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, From what I have learned and seen as to what Keel provides, our company is most likely going to use Keel as our platform for development. But after a week of wading through documentation and source code I still can't get a working Keel demo going. I would like to demonstrate an existing working system, locally build, to convince my colleagues that Keel is the way to go. I have installed Eclipse 3.1 on Windows XP with Java SDK 1.4.2., Ant 1.6.5, Maven 1.0.2. I have tried the following: a) I downloaded the Keel app on sourceforge (Helm 1.8) and the graphical Keel App starts, but I can't find the documentation to say how I should use it. I tried the menu entries, but it does not make sense. b) I read wiki documentation that says one should start with Ant - but this fails halfway through (the builds cannot get everyting, etc). c) I discovered (in the forum) notes that says Maven is the way to go (contrary to the wiki Starting notes!), so I worked through chapter 13. The interaction between Maven/Eclipse is not clear to me (yet), but if I run maven from the commandline it complains about some jars that it can't get (others it did download). If I run it inside Eclipse (as an External tool), I get similar problems. My Questions: a) Should I continue with the maven route? b) Which documentation set is the nearest to the real thing? I may come back with more specific questions after I have clarity on the above Any help/pointers will be appreciated Jacques Smit http://keelframework.org/documentation.shtml Keelgroup mailing list [email protected] http://lists.keelframework.com/listinfo.cgi/keelgroup-keelframework.com