Re: *** Important **** Avalon/Frotress debate

hi there

when i read the news on the avalon-website it seems to me that the 
discussion is already finished?!?
http://avalon.apache.org/news/SinglePlatform.html

greetings
stefan


Shash Chatterjee wrote:

> All,
> 
> If you have invested time and money in writing or using Keel/Fortress/Avalon
> components, please pay attention.  There is discussion in Avalon land on the
> future of Fortress (which Keel depends on).  I have included my response
> below, but if any of  you care to, please send your opinion in.
> 
> If you aren't subscribed to the avalon developer's list, subscribe here:
> http://avalon.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
> It is also reachable through your newsreader:
> news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.avalon.devel
> 
> Shash
> 
> Here's my 2c on the topic:
> 
> [1] Fortress stays in Avalon with maintenance
>  [2] Fortress moves to incubator for TLP
>  [3] Fortress moves to D-Haven
>  [4] Fortress moves to XXX (enter your choice here)
>  [99999] Fortress is nuked and users forced to migrate
> 
> (lower is more priority, 1 is better, 2 is worse.)
> 
> I don't know how to show associations in this format.  Here's what I really want:
> 
> [1] Fortress stays in Avalon with maintenance, binary compatibility, and new
> enhancements/features. At the same time, have a defined migration path with
> binary compatibility to the unified Avalon container (must support features
> ECM, Phoenix, Fortress users have come to depend upon, even though they may
> not technically be the best solutions).  I'll also add that I am volunteering
> to help with maintaining and enhancing Fortress as part of a team.
> 
> Shash
> 
> Berin Loritsch wrote:
> 
> 
>>I don't want to belabor the point, nor do I want this to drag on forever. 
> 
> Quite simply put, this opinion gathering tool is in the form of a vote, but it
> is not binding.  It is only a way to show your preference.  Please put a
> number of the order of preference that you have for what to do with Fortress.
>  If any of the options is completely disagreeable put a -1 next to it.
> 
>>[] Fortress stays in Avalon with maintenance
>>[] Fortress moves to incubator for TLP
>>[] Fortress moves to D-Haven
>>[] Fortress moves to XXX (enter your choice here)
>>[] Fortress is nuked and users forced to migrate
>>
>>This is merely an opinion poll, so please don't write real long comments. 
> 
> If you have a new option, write it in.  The results of the opinion poll will
> feed a proposal I have so that we can move along quickly.