Re: Licensing questions

eek, I'm going to ask Darin what happened

Juergen Kreileder wrote:

> Marc St-Jean writes:
>
>> BTW, I went to verify how the "blackdown binary license" would be 
>> different from the Sun license with regards to distribution with a 
>> distro. However after downloading twice from the ftp.tux.org mirror 
>> the LICENSE file at the root of the 1.4.2-01 directory appears to be 
>> corrupt. In the SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERNS sub-section B. is 
>> truncated at "... agree to defe". Sub-section C. has a (v) clause 
>> with no text. Sub-section E. is truncated at "... reproduced in its 
>> enti". Could someone please verify this file?
>
>
> You're right.  Calvin, this is a problem inherited from the Sun source,
> the jdk/jre licenses are broken in the 07-fcs code.
>
>
>     Juergen


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE:  This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by 
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]