Re: Licensing questions
Marc St-Jean <[email protected]> Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:21:09 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.linux.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jan 11, 2005, at 5:18 PM, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > Marc St-Jean writes: > >> BTW, I went to verify how the "blackdown binary license" would be >> different from the Sun license with regards to distribution with a >> distro. However after downloading twice from the ftp.tux.org mirror >> the LICENSE file at the root of the 1.4.2-01 directory appears to be >> corrupt. In the SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERNS sub-section B. is >> truncated at "... agree to defe". Sub-section C. has a (v) clause >> with no text. Sub-section E. is truncated at "... reproduced in its >> enti". Could someone please verify this file? > > You're right. Calvin, this is a problem inherited from the Sun source, > the jdk/jre licenses are broken in the 07-fcs code. > > > Juergen Other than the corruption it appears to be the same as the Sun JDK 1.4.2_X license. This prompts me to ask, is the Blackdown license supposed to be different from Sun's? Marc ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]