Re: luxor made easy
Gerald Bauer <[email protected]> Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:44:28 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.luxor-xul.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Denis, > I've packaged all that in an eclipse project (no > build.xml, sorry), and the main class is TestMain > (no > package). > > Widgets implemented : hbox, vbox, textfield (typed > ones), labels, button. No style sheet. > > Please give me your opinion on that architecture (as > I told you previously, we definitly need to make > luxor easier to gain a larger audience, and I think > that would be a great step forward). I just checked your sources. It looks great. Using reflection and a naming convention for automatic event binding is a great step forward. Also binding form fields to Java beans a la Struts or WebWork is a great idea. Later on you might wonna consider switching over to using POJOs (=plain old java objects) for your data beans and use the IoC (=inversion of control) pattern. Let me know if you want to merge your source with the Luxor main branch or if you want to create a new "light-weight" alternative package. You're more than welcome to do so. - Gerald ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/