Re: luxor made easy

Hi Gerald,

> > Please give me your opinion on that architecture
> 
> I just checked your sources. It looks great.
> Using reflection and a naming convention for 
> automatic event binding is a great step forward. 
> 
>   Also binding form fields to Java beans a la Struts
> or WebWork is a great idea. Later on you might wonna
> consider switching over to using POJOs (=plain old
> java objects) for your data beans and use the IoC
> (=inversion of control) pattern.

I'll have to look at this. Actually I am wondering
about just using Jython, since it is possible to
create classes properties on the fly.

> Let me know if you want to merge your source with
> the Luxor main branch or if you want to create a new
> "light-weight" alternative package. You're more than
> welcome to do so.

I hate branching, and I don't think I'll have time to
implements all the necessary widgets, let aside the
styling stuff. So I'd definitly prefer to merge, but
the architecture is so different... I think it would
be great to make a first proof of concept together,
with basic styling and some documentation to get some
feedback from users.

Cheers,

Denis

=====
=========================
|Denis Cardon, Tranquil I.T. Systems 
|10 rue du Docteur Bouchard, 49400 Saumur
|Tel: +33(0)2.41.67.56.99
|Web: http://www.tranquil-it-systems.fr
=========================

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/