Re: I am new to the list
Lane Sharman <[email protected]> Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:31:09 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.luxor-xul.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
You must account for the runtime to support your client, right? What has happenned to the Java runtime from 1.0 to 1.5 w/respect to size? Check this out and you will see why you need to install some sort of Java runtime on the client. For sure, you do not need a browser tho to get a dynamic app up and running. In fact, thin java clients have been around since 1.1 and serialization. -Lane Sherman Chen wrote: >Forgive my ignorance, but why do I need a full-blown browser to do what I want to do? > >Basically, what I want to do is to create a thin client (in a client-server environment) in which the screens are sent dynamically from the server to the client so users don't have to wait forever for the initial download (like with Java Applet) - also, this way, only the Objects the user needs will be downloaded to the user when it is needed. And, it'll make maintaining the GUI easy because I don't have to release a new client app everytime there's a change to the GUI. > >So, I thought something like Luxor will be perfect (because I don't want to be tied to Mozilla/netscape). > >Thanks, >Sherman >On Monday, February 02, 2004, at 11:21PM, Gerald Bauer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>Hello Sherman Chen, >> >> >> >>>I am new to the list and I have a question about >>>Luxor - >>> >>>I want to be able to send the XUL from a server to a >>>client (maybe via JMS) and have the client build the >>>interface on the fly. Is that doable using Luxor? >>>If so, are there any samples out there I can take a >>>look at? >>> >>> >> Well, Luxor is not yet a full-blown browser a la >>Mozilla but for now Luxor is a XUL toolkit. Two >>browser projects are in the works using the XUL >>toolkit, that is, Luxilla and Eldorado but they are >>far from being finished. >> >> Also note that XUL itself is only a building block >>and that you also need a scripting language (e.g. >>Python, Beanshell, Groovy, etc.) and more to have >>truly interactive application (UI). >> >> You might wonna check out alternative XUL >>toolkits/browsers/runtimes/players such as XWT, >>Thinlet, Mozilla etc. before starting to build your >>own Luxor XUL Toolkit mini-browser. See >>http://xul.sourceforge.net for links to alternative >>XUL projects. >> >> If you want to roll your own mini browser using the >>Luxor XUL Toolkit you might wonna check out the >>Luxilla project or Sahara (aka luxor-sandbox). >> >> - Gerald >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 >>Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration >>See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. >>http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn >>_______________________________________________ >>luxor-xul-user mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luxor-xul-user >> >> >> >> > > >Sherman >----- >Fear is the path to the Dark Side. Fear leads to Anger. Anger leads to Hate. Hate leads to Suffering. > - Yoda, Episode I > > >------------------------------------------------------- >The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 >Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration >See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. >http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn >_______________________________________________ >luxor-xul-user mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luxor-xul-user > > > -- Lane Sharman Just Do IT, Better. 858-755-2868