Re: Preparing for 2.0 beta 1

Hi Simon,
--- "Bordet, Simone" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I need:
> 
> 3) A volunteer that chases down the
> I18NStandardMBean bug, if Martin Fuzzey does not
> follow up on this

I may be able to jump on this in a couple of days -
let me know.  If so - there isn't a bug in the bug
tracker for this one - what is wrong with it?

IMHO's follow:
> 4) Opinions on how the distribution should look
> like: 
> We need to ship sources separated from binary or
> everything together ? 

Seperate distributions

> MX4J tools separated from core JMX implementation ?

No

> JMX classes jar separated from implementation jar ?

No

> What is the best way to build MX4J from the
> distribution ? Follow e.g. Tomcat's source
> distribution style ?

A user should be able to download the source
distribution and build a binary distribution.  We
should document having to download the extra libraries
that we can't distribute(e.g. JDK1.3 - jaas, jce,
jsse, etc.).  Users should also be able to run the
compliance tests (after downloading the RI, of
course).

Brian

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/