Re: Preparing for 2.0 beta 1
"Carlos Quiroz" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.mx4j.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi In my opinion: > We need to ship sources separated from binary or everything together ? I think separated > MX4J tools separated from core JMX implementation ? Separated > JMX classes jar separated from implementation jar ? This a bit more difficult. I'd say for all practical purposes together but I still wonder if there are any "legal" thing by distributing our JMX classes > What is the best way to build MX4J from the distribution ? Follow e.g. > Tomcat's source distribution style ? Isn't the current system ok? Regards Carlos > > Many thanks > > Simon > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/