[ mx4j-Bugs-968203 ] JMXRI + MX4J documentation is wrong
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.mx4j.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bugs item #968203, was opened at 2004-06-07 16:41 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by biorn_steedom You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=450647&aid=968203&group_id=47745 Category: None >Group: Release 2.0.1 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Thomas Kläger (tomy) >Assigned to: Simone Bordet (biorn_steedom) Summary: JMXRI + MX4J documentation is wrong Initial Comment: The documentation for using MX4J together with JMXRI says we should set the property 'javax.management. builder.initial' to use JMXRI together with JMXRI. The sample later on (line 176 of src/docs/english/jmx-explained) set the property 'java. management.builder.initial', which is wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Simone Bordet (biorn_steedom) Date: 2004-06-12 23:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=128193 Applied the patch ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Thomas Kläger (tomy) Date: 2004-06-08 15:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=261676 Since the anonymous cvs access runs again I can finally attach the patch to correct the documentation ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=450647&aid=968203&group_id=47745 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504