RE: SOAP Namespace

Two things.  The first is really teeney, I prefer to use "_" instead of
".".  Second, I think that the name should be something like
www.mx4j.org instead of mx4j.sourceforge.net, since mx4j is really an
entity that at the moment happens to reside at sf.net, not a business
entity of Source Forge.

http://www.mx4j.org/remote/soap/1_0

JMHO.


Regards,
Alan

-----Original Message-----
From: Bordet, Simone [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 3:45 AM
To: MX4J-Dev (E-mail)
Subject: [Mx4j-devel] SOAP Namespace

I posted on axis-dev asking for best practices on choosing namespaces,
and got no answer.
However, an interesting discussion has been held on geronimo-dev about
similar argument, and I am now convinced that the namespace should have
a version indicator that represent the implementation version.
About the remote JMX version, I think we will support the latest one in
any case, like we do with JMX, so it is redundant to specify it.

I propose to use 

http://mx4j.sourceforge.net/remote/soap/1.0

as namespace for the SOAP implementation.

Any comment ?

Simon


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Mx4j-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mx4j-devel


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php