RE: Remaining tasklist for alpha?

Hi

In that case better do it for the version 2.0 rather than any other else!

Regards
Carlos

Quoting "Bordet, Simone" <[email protected]>:

> Hi,
> 
> > > Another point that is not clear to me is the status of the 
> > > HTTP adaptor: Carlos ?
> > > I was also thinking of moving the HTTP adaptor from 
> > > mx4j.adaptor.http.* to mx4j.tools.adaptor.http.*. It is a 
> > > breaking change, but I think the next release of MX4J will be 
> > > named 2.0, so it is a major change and if we want to make 
> > > this change better we do it now.
> >
> > I don't really like to do this kind of "big changes" but I'll 
> > leave it up to you if you think is the right thing to do
> > I've been quite busy lately since I (re)started my 
> > postgraduate studies 
> > but I think in 2 weeks I should have more time. At least it should be 
> > fixed the internationalization issue.
> 
> The main reason behind this is the fact that in JDK 1.5 JMX and JSR 160 will
> be included in JDK.
> Consequently I expect people to download mx4j-tools.jar more than mx4j.jar or
> mx4j-remote.jar, and I would like to be consistent in the naming of
> packages.
> 
> Simon
> 




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community?  Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/