Re: MX4J, JDK1.5 and Progress/Sonic JMS

Hi,

Not sure if the mailing list is still working - I am getting spam from
it, but the sf.net site seems to not have any updates since May...

Anyway, solved the problem - it seems you can use multiple JNDI
implementations in the same JVM.  By specifying the Sonic JNDI for the
JMS InitialContext and the RMI JNDI for the JMXConnector environment we
get the required effect.

Regards,
Chris

> _____________________________________________ 
> From: 	Kimpton, C (Chris)  
> Sent:	26 October 2006 14:11
> To:	'[email protected]'
> Subject:	RE: MX4J, JDK1.5 and Progress/Sonic JMS
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Same problem with MX4J 3.0.2 - looks like the JNDI implementation of
> Sonic is incomplete and does not know how to handle these requests.
> 
> I am thinking I need to write some kind of federated JNDI wrapper that
> sends Sonic requests to its JNDI and the rest through the RMI
> registry.
> 
> Regards,
> Chris
> 
> _____________________________________________ 
> From: 	Kimpton, C (Chris)  
> Sent:	26 October 2006 13:14
> To:	'[email protected]'
> Subject:	MX4J, JDK1.5 and Progress/Sonic JMS
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We have been using MX4J for a few years now with minor problem (see
> list for details  ;-)  )
> 
> We've tried switching to JDK1.5 and using the system property
> -Djavax.management.builder.initial=mx4j.server.MX4JMBeanServerBuilder
> things have still worked.
> 
> What I understand this is doing is to get the JDK JMX to use MX4J for
> the underlying components.
> 
> Now, we are looking to switch JMS providers and are looking at
> Progress/SonicMQ ( http://www.sonicsoftware.com ).
> 
> With our current JMS provider (Fiorano) , we specified the Fiorano
> JNDI naming/initial context and things all connected fine and we could
> use our JMXConnectors too.
> 
> With Sonic, we now specify their naming service - which works for
> their JMS objects, but gives a problem in the
> JMXConnectorFactory.connect call.
> 
> We are still using MX4J 2.0.1 - so I will try the latest version of
> MX4J.
> 
> Otherwise, anyone got any other ideas?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> ____________________________________________
> Chris Kimpton
> 

_____________________________________________________________

This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error, please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this email or attachments. We exclude any liability for the content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in writing. If this email contains an offer, that should be considered as an invitation to treat.
_____________________________________________________________

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642

_______________________________________________
Mx4j-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mx4j-user