Re: cglib port?

Yes we looked into that, and we got it working. Only
problem was that serialization didn't work properly
(it worked for POJOs with interface, but not for POJOs
without). Since Nanning is so close to a 1.0 release
we did not want to fiddle with the internals in ways
we didn't understand.

Then again, if there's sufficiently popular demand for
it, I could implement it again. It's really not that
difficult and if you don't need serialization it works
fine.

 --- Kevin O'Neill <[email protected]> skrev: >
Reading the archieves from last month there was some
> talk about porting
> nanning from dyn proxies to cglib. Is that still the
> plan?
>=20
> If it is does it mean that nanning will be able to
> "aspect" pojos not
> just pojos with interfaces?
>=20
> -k.
> =20
> --=20
> If you don't test then your code is only a
> collection of bugs which=20
> apparently behave like a working program.=20
>=20
> Website: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/kevin/
> Pub Key:
> http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/kevin/public.asc
>=20

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature
name=3Dsignature.asc
=20

H=F6strusk och gr=E5 moln - k=F6p en resa till solen p=E5 Yahoo! Resor p=E5=
 adressen http://se.docs.yahoo.com/travel/index.html