Re: cglib port?
"Kevin O'Neill" <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:34:08 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.nanning.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | rocketred pty ltd |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-vzA94rQ9BpCtZr2pqqpw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 16:45, Jon Tirs=E9n wrote: > Yes we looked into that, and we got it working. Only > problem was that serialization didn't work properly > (it worked for POJOs with interface, but not for POJOs > without). Since Nanning is so close to a 1.0 release > we did not want to fiddle with the internals in ways > we didn't understand. Actually what I want to do is intercept (no mixins at this point) prevayler commands. So if it can't do serialization I'm kinda stuffed :). > Then again, if there's sufficiently popular demand for > it, I could implement it again. It's really not that > difficult and if you don't need serialization it works > fine. Is this something that the developer could configure at runtime? > --- Kevin O'Neill <[email protected]> skrev: > > Reading the archieves from last month there was some > > talk about porting > > nanning from dyn proxies to cglib. Is that still the > > plan? > >=20 > > If it is does it mean that nanning will be able to > > "aspect" pojos not > > just pojos with interfaces? > >=20 > > -k. > > =20 > > --=20 > > If you don't test then your code is only a > > collection of bugs which=20 > > apparently behave like a working program.=20 > >=20 > > Website: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/kevin/ > > Pub Key: > > http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/kevin/public.asc > >=20 >=20 > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature > name=3Dsignature.asc > =20 >=20 > H=F6strusk och gr=E5 moln - k=F6p en resa till solen p=E5 Yahoo! Resor p= =E5 adressen http://se.docs.yahoo.com/travel/index.html > _______________________________________________ > nanning-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.codehaus.org/mailman/listinfo/nanning-dev --=20 If you don't test then your code is only a collection of bugs which=20 apparently behave like a working program.=20 Website: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/kevin/ Pub Key: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/kevin/public.asc --=-vzA94rQ9BpCtZr2pqqpw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/j7eQxlF5HSMCyVkRAndtAJ9CY6EJRnaZS8wty1TxAtoZEhrpNQCfVKDv 8WCGqakGlV9/HUf05VFXHcI= =DHkg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vzA94rQ9BpCtZr2pqqpw--