Re: cglib port?

"Kevin O'Neill" <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Oct 2003 19:34:08 +1000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.nanning.devel
Organization rocketred pty ltd
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--=-vzA94rQ9BpCtZr2pqqpw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 16:45, Jon Tirs=E9n wrote:
> Yes we looked into that, and we got it working. Only
> problem was that serialization didn't work properly
> (it worked for POJOs with interface, but not for POJOs
> without). Since Nanning is so close to a 1.0 release
> we did not want to fiddle with the internals in ways
> we didn't understand.

Actually what I want to do is intercept (no mixins at this point)
prevayler commands. So if it can't do serialization I'm kinda stuffed
:).

> Then again, if there's sufficiently popular demand for
> it, I could implement it again. It's really not that
> difficult and if you don't need serialization it works
> fine.

Is this something that the developer could configure at runtime?

>  --- Kevin O'Neill <[email protected]> skrev: >
> Reading the archieves from last month there was some
> > talk about porting
> > nanning from dyn proxies to cglib. Is that still the
> > plan?
> >=20
> > If it is does it mean that nanning will be able to
> > "aspect" pojos not
> > just pojos with interfaces?
> >=20
> > -k.
> > =20
> > --=20
> > If you don't test then your code is only a
> > collection of bugs which=20
> > apparently behave like a working program.=20
> >=20
> > Website: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/kevin/
> > Pub Key:
> > http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/kevin/public.asc
> >=20
>=20
> > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature
> name=3Dsignature.asc
> =20
>=20
> H=F6strusk och gr=E5 moln - k=F6p en resa till solen p=E5 Yahoo! Resor p=
=E5 adressen http://se.docs.yahoo.com/travel/index.html
> _______________________________________________
> nanning-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.codehaus.org/mailman/listinfo/nanning-dev
--=20
If you don't test then your code is only a collection of bugs which=20
apparently behave like a working program.=20

Website: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/kevin/
Pub Key: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/kevin/public.asc

--=-vzA94rQ9BpCtZr2pqqpw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/j7eQxlF5HSMCyVkRAndtAJ9CY6EJRnaZS8wty1TxAtoZEhrpNQCfVKDv
8WCGqakGlV9/HUf05VFXHcI=
=DHkg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-vzA94rQ9BpCtZr2pqqpw--