RE: possible bug? unable to retrieve more than one method attribute

Well javadoc attributes work great - I was afraid that if I ran the
attribs compiler every time it would completely recompile everything -
apparently it's smart enough not to do that.  And even when it does
compile it's almost instantaneous.

--- Steve Conover <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm going to explore the attributes compiler thing, I'd rather have
> my
> code use what's being updated (and I have to admit that having the
> attribs as javadoc tags would be really nice).  If I decide I don't
> like it and want XML files again, I'll write a test and send the bug
> in.
> 
> Regards,
> Steve
> 
> --- jon_tirsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yeah, in our unit-tests we execute the attribute-compiler manually,
> > you
> > can see an example in AbstractAttributeTest I think.
> > 
> > If there's a bug that's annoying you, send me a failing JUnit-test
> > and
> > I'll try to fix it. (Just refactor out the stuff your trying to do,
> > no
> > need to isolate the problem or anything. I'll do that.)
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> > Steve Conover
> > Sent: den 28 maj 2003 18:51
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Nanning-developer] possible bug? unable to retrieve
> > more
> > than one method attribute
> > 
> > The attributes have different names, so that's not the problem...
> > 
> > The reason I use the XML version is that I've been trying to avoid
> > having an extra compilation step (e.g an ant task).  Do I have any
> > other options that don't require that extra step?
> > 
> > In the meantime I'll port over to the ant-task-based property
> > configuration and try that out.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Steve
> > 
> > --- Jon Tirsén <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > It could be. Are you using the XML feature of the
> > > attributes stuff? That isn't very well-maintained at
> > > the moment. All the tests run but the implementation
> > > hasn't really hanged on to all the later refactorings.
> > > I think it's time for a rewrite.
> > > 
> > > Oh, and Nanning currently doesn't support several
> > > attributes with the same name.
> > > 
> > >  --- Steve Conover <[email protected]> skrev: > I have 3
> > > attributes in an xml file for one of my
> > > > methods.  I can
> > > > retrieve the first one, but the others dont seem to
> > > > exist
> > > > (Attributes.hasAttribute reports false, and
> > > > getAttribute returns null).
> > > > 
> > > > Is this a known bug?
> > > > 
> > > > -Steve
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> > > > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your
> > > > application fit in a
> > > > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check
> > > > out ObjectStore.
> > > > Now part of Progress Software.
> > > > http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Nanning-developer mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nanning-developer 
> > > 
> > > _____________________________________________________
> > > Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo!
> > Express
> > > Se mer på: http://se.docs.yahoo.com/info/express/help/index.html
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> > > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit
> in
> > a
> > > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out
> ObjectStore.
> > > Now part of Progress Software.
> > http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Nanning-developer mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nanning-developer
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in
> a
> > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
> > Now part of Progress Software.
> http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nanning-developer mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nanning-developer
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in
> a
> > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
> > Now part of Progress Software.
> http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nanning-developer mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nanning-developer
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
> relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
> Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> _______________________________________________
> Nanning-developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nanning-developer



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge