RE: possible bug? unable to retrieve more than one method attribute

Yeah, it's QDox. It's damn fast... I've recently upgraded to QDox 1.2
that seems to be even faster. It also supports inner classes (1.1
didn't) so maybe I'll get some time to work on that too some time.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Steve Conover
Sent: den 28 maj 2003 20:29
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Nanning-developer] possible bug? unable to retrieve more
than one method attribute

Well javadoc attributes work great - I was afraid that if I ran the
attribs compiler every time it would completely recompile everything -
apparently it's smart enough not to do that.  And even when it does
compile it's almost instantaneous.

--- Steve Conover <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm going to explore the attributes compiler thing, I'd rather have
> my
> code use what's being updated (and I have to admit that having the
> attribs as javadoc tags would be really nice).  If I decide I don't
> like it and want XML files again, I'll write a test and send the bug
> in.
> 
> Regards,
> Steve
> 
> --- jon_tirsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yeah, in our unit-tests we execute the attribute-compiler manually,
> > you
> > can see an example in AbstractAttributeTest I think.
> > 
> > If there's a bug that's annoying you, send me a failing JUnit-test
> > and
> > I'll try to fix it. (Just refactor out the stuff your trying to do,
> > no
> > need to isolate the problem or anything. I'll do that.)
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> > Steve Conover
> > Sent: den 28 maj 2003 18:51
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Nanning-developer] possible bug? unable to retrieve
> > more
> > than one method attribute
> > 
> > The attributes have different names, so that's not the problem...
> > 
> > The reason I use the XML version is that I've been trying to avoid
> > having an extra compilation step (e.g an ant task).  Do I have any
> > other options that don't require that extra step?
> > 
> > In the meantime I'll port over to the ant-task-based property
> > configuration and try that out.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Steve
> > 
> > --- Jon Tirsén <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > It could be. Are you using the XML feature of the
> > > attributes stuff? That isn't very well-maintained at
> > > the moment. All the tests run but the implementation
> > > hasn't really hanged on to all the later refactorings.
> > > I think it's time for a rewrite.
> > > 
> > > Oh, and Nanning currently doesn't support several
> > > attributes with the same name.
> > > 
> > >  --- Steve Conover <[email protected]> skrev: > I have 3
> > > attributes in an xml file for one of my
> > > > methods.  I can
> > > > retrieve the first one, but the others dont seem to
> > > > exist
> > > > (Attributes.hasAttribute reports false, and
> > > > getAttribute returns null).
> > > > 
> > > > Is this a known bug?
> > > > 
> > > > -Steve
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> > > > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your
> > > > application fit in a
> > > > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check
> > > > out ObjectStore.
> > > > Now part of Progress Software.
> > > > http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Nanning-developer mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nanning-developer 
> > > 
> > > _____________________________________________________
> > > Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo!
> > Express
> > > Se mer på: http://se.docs.yahoo.com/info/express/help/index.html
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> > > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit
> in
> > a
> > > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out
> ObjectStore.
> > > Now part of Progress Software.
> > http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Nanning-developer mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nanning-developer
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in
> a
> > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
> > Now part of Progress Software.
> http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nanning-developer mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nanning-developer
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in
> a
> > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
> > Now part of Progress Software.
> http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nanning-developer mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nanning-developer
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
> If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
> relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
> Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
> _______________________________________________
> Nanning-developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nanning-developer



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
Nanning-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nanning-developer



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5