Does anybody want to replace base handler ?

Holger Krug <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.netbeans.modules.mdr.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Probably today evening or tomorrow morning I will prepare the patches
announced earlier on this mailing list for review.

I would ask anybody interested (Martin !) to review the proposed new
API (http://mdr.netbeans.org/issues/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=6618)
to discuss any objections.

My current local sources contain one further feature, which I added
for testing purposes. I currently do not need this feature, so I'm
free either to submit the related patches or throw them away. The
feature consists in allowing the user to replace the base handler
classes (like AssociationHandler etc.) by alternative classes using
system properties which name the replacing classes. I introduced this
feature because I wanted to play with base handler classes. Although
this feature is currently no very usable because it's not yet
documented how the replacing classes should look like, its
introduction could be nice insofar as it disciplines to strive for
even greater modularity of MDR.

As I said I'm free to include the related code to my patches or
not. Certainly it's simpler for me to include it, because it is
already there. Any comments ?

-- 
Holger Krug
[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.