Re: Does anybody want to replace base handler ?

Hi Holger,
I would rather like to have a patch not containing the changes to 
handlers. Regarding the handlers I would first like to see what is the 
motivation/usecase. We can then think together about what's the best way 
of achieving it.
Thanks,
Martin


Holger Krug wrote:
> Probably today evening or tomorrow morning I will prepare the patches
> announced earlier on this mailing list for review.
> 
> I would ask anybody interested (Martin !) to review the proposed new
> API (http://mdr.netbeans.org/issues/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=6618)
> to discuss any objections.
> 
> My current local sources contain one further feature, which I added
> for testing purposes. I currently do not need this feature, so I'm
> free either to submit the related patches or throw them away. The
> feature consists in allowing the user to replace the base handler
> classes (like AssociationHandler etc.) by alternative classes using
> system properties which name the replacing classes. I introduced this
> feature because I wanted to play with base handler classes. Although
> this feature is currently no very usable because it's not yet
> documented how the replacing classes should look like, its
> introduction could be nice insofar as it disciplines to strive for
> even greater modularity of MDR.
> 
> As I said I'm free to include the related code to my patches or
> not. Certainly it's simpler for me to include it, because it is
> already there. Any comments ?
>