Why does a MOF Import need to be clustered to allow cross-package inheritance?
Matthias Rieger <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:52:16 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.modules.mdr.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi
I'm having a problem with import between two MOF packages.
According to the MOF 1.4 specification (2.3.6.3 Package Importing, p.=20
2-16)
Here are some examples of how a Package can reuse imported =20
elements. The importing
Package can declare:
=95 Classes whose supertypes are imported Classes, and
...
As XMI serialization I now have MOF package P1 which imports MOF =20
package P2
(with isClustered=3Dfalse).
Class A from package P1 has a superclass B from package P2 (that's what
the specification cited above explicitly allows). I load the XMI into =20=
the MDR and
when I instantiate package P1 like this:
repository.createExtent("Name",packageP1);
the MDR runs into the following error while the class file for the =20
proxy interface of package P1
is being generated (error message truncated and aliased):
Package definition is incomplete: class A super =3D B
at org.netbeans.mdr.NBMDRepositoryImpl.resolveSuperclasses=20
(NBMDRepositoryImpl.java:898)
at org.netbeans.mdr.NBMDRepositoryImpl.instantiatePackage=20
(NBMDRepositoryImpl.java:812)
Looking at the code (NBMDRepositoryImpl.java:898)
it seems like the superclass B is not found among the classProxies.
That is not so good. Now, when I set isClustered=3Dtrue in the above =20
Import, everything runs well.
Why do I need to set isClustered to true when the specification =20
allows simple imports to do
what I need? Where does the fault lie?
Thanks for any enlightenment
Best regards
Matthias Rieger