RE: [mdr-users] Suggested way to use MDR

Hello,

The result is empty XMI document (only header) like this:

<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'ISO-8859-1' ?>
<XMI xmi.version = '1.2' xmlns:Model = 'org.omg.xmi.namespace.Model'
timestamp = 'Thu May 12 07:46:05 CEST 2005'>
  <XMI.header>
    <XMI.documentation>
      <XMI.exporter>Netbeans XMI Writer</XMI.exporter>
      <XMI.exporterVersion>1.0</XMI.exporterVersion>
    </XMI.documentation>
  </XMI.header>
  <XMI.content/>
</XMI>

I have try this with 2 UML-XMI diagram from Poseidon without diagram/graphic
information.

Sincerely,
Nanda Firdausi
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Matula [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: 11 Mei 2005 23:40
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [mdr-users] Suggested way to use MDR
> 
> Hi Nanda,
> 
> Nanda Firdausi wrote:
> 
> >I've already try to use the tools with UML that created by Poseidon, 
> >but it isn't success.
> >  
> >
> What exactly did not work?
> 
> >Actually, the most feature that I need is model management 
> using XMI. I 
> >don't really need the MDR repository (it's kind of bonus :) ). Since 
> >the only tools that comfort with MOF, XMI, JMI is MDR, then I 
> >interested to look into it. But I'll prefer maturity than 
> >standardization, so if MDR is actually not so mature, I'll 
> choose EMF 
> >(which sadly doesn't comfort MOF and JMI :( ).
> >  
> >
> I think that MDR is perfectly mature for what you want. 
> That's why we have not had to make any major changes to it 
> for quite a long time now.
> Martin
>