Re: [mdr-users] Suggested way to use MDR
Martin Matula <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.modules.mdr.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think this is because of a common mistake the users do when trying to use UML2MOF tool. The problem is that only packages stereotyped by <<metamodel>> stereotype are mapped to MOF (you probably did not add <<metamodel>> stereotype to your package). This is a feature of the UML Profile for MOF - it allows you to structure your metamodel into several logical subpackages without transforming these to MOF. Regards, Martin Nanda Firdausi wrote: >Hello, > >The result is empty XMI document (only header) like this: > ><?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'ISO-8859-1' ?> ><XMI xmi.version = '1.2' xmlns:Model = 'org.omg.xmi.namespace.Model' >timestamp = 'Thu May 12 07:46:05 CEST 2005'> > <XMI.header> > <XMI.documentation> > <XMI.exporter>Netbeans XMI Writer</XMI.exporter> > <XMI.exporterVersion>1.0</XMI.exporterVersion> > </XMI.documentation> > </XMI.header> > <XMI.content/> ></XMI> > >I have try this with 2 UML-XMI diagram from Poseidon without diagram/graphic >information. > >Sincerely, >Nanda Firdausi > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Martin Matula [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: 11 Mei 2005 23:40 >>To: [email protected] >>Subject: Re: [mdr-users] Suggested way to use MDR >> >>Hi Nanda, >> >>Nanda Firdausi wrote: >> >> >> >>>I've already try to use the tools with UML that created by Poseidon, >>>but it isn't success. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>What exactly did not work? >> >> >> >>>Actually, the most feature that I need is model management >>> >>> >>using XMI. I >> >> >>>don't really need the MDR repository (it's kind of bonus :) ). Since >>>the only tools that comfort with MOF, XMI, JMI is MDR, then I >>>interested to look into it. But I'll prefer maturity than >>>standardization, so if MDR is actually not so mature, I'll >>> >>> >>choose EMF >> >> >>>(which sadly doesn't comfort MOF and JMI :( ). >>> >>> >>> >>> >>I think that MDR is perfectly mature for what you want. >>That's why we have not had to make any major changes to it >>for quite a long time now. >>Martin >> >> >> > > > >