Re: [mdr-users] Operation as a context of ActivityGraph

Hello Martin,

    It is not possible because the context is a BehaviorFeature and
BehaviorFeature does not extends Namespace.



    Thanks,

    Leo 

2005/6/23, Martin Matula <[email protected]>:
> Set the namespace to the same value as the context.
> Regards,
> Martin
> 
> Leonardo Gresta Paulino Murta wrote:
> 
> >Hi Jarda,
> >
> >       Thanks for the hint! However, when I do not set the namespace of the
> >ActivityGraph, the ActivityGraph is not written in XMI file. In other words:
> >I do not receive the CompositionViolationException and the generated XMI
> >file correctly has an element relating the xmiid of the Operation with the
> >xmiid of the ActivityGraph, but the ActivityGraph itself is not there...
> >
> >       The attached file (test.xml) is the generated XMI file. It is using
> >SPEM metamodel, but SPEM is derived from UML metamodel. The element
> >"SPEM:A_behavior_contex" relates a WorkDefinition, which extends Operation,
> >with an ActivityGraph (xmi.idref = "a7"). However, the ActivityGraph itself
> >(xmiid = "a7") is not there! Do you have any other hints?
> >
> >       Thanks a lot!!!
> >
> >       Leo
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Jaroslav Drazan [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 6:33 AM
> >>To: [email protected]
> >>Subject: Re: [mdr-users] Operation as a context of ActivityGraph
> >>
> >>Hello Leo,
> >>You can't set the composition more than once. That's the reason why all
> >>compositions defined by UML (ModelElement in Namespace, Feature in
> >>Classifier...) are optional (multiplicity is 0..1). So if you want to
> >>specify ActivityGraph for some BehaviorFeature you mustn't specify its
> >>namespace (if it has been already set you must first set it to null).
> >>
> >>Regards
> >>Jarda
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hello,
> >>>
> >>>     I am using UML metamodel and trying to set the context of an
> >>>ActivityGraph to an Operation. The specification says the context of an
> >>>ActivityGraph may be a BehavioralFeature. Moreover, Operation inherits
> >>>
> >>>
> >>from
> >>
> >>
> >>>BehavioralFeature. However, a CompositionViolationException is thrown.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>It
> >>
> >>
> >>>complains that I am trying to set more than one context to the
> >>>ActivityGraph. I suppose it considers the namespace where the
> >>>
> >>>
> >>ActivityGraph
> >>
> >>
> >>>is inserted as an existing context. Am I doing something wrong? What is
> >>>
> >>>
> >>the
> >>
> >>
> >>>correct way to set the context of an ActivityGraph to an Operation?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Where
> >>
> >>
> >>>should I insert the ActivityGraph to avoid the
> >>>CompositionViolationException?
> >>>
> >>>     Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>     Leo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>____________________________________________________________
> >>http://www.listicka.cz
> >>
> >>
> 
>