Re: [mdr-users] Operation as a context of ActivityGraph

Could you please point me to the metamodel you are using?
Thanks,
Martin

Leonardo Murta wrote:

>Hello Martin,
>
>    It is not possible because the context is a BehaviorFeature and
>BehaviorFeature does not extends Namespace.
>
>
>
>    Thanks,
>
>    Leo 
>
>2005/6/23, Martin Matula <[email protected]>:
>  
>
>>Set the namespace to the same value as the context.
>>Regards,
>>Martin
>>
>>Leonardo Gresta Paulino Murta wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi Jarda,
>>>
>>>      Thanks for the hint! However, when I do not set the namespace of the
>>>ActivityGraph, the ActivityGraph is not written in XMI file. In other words:
>>>I do not receive the CompositionViolationException and the generated XMI
>>>file correctly has an element relating the xmiid of the Operation with the
>>>xmiid of the ActivityGraph, but the ActivityGraph itself is not there...
>>>
>>>      The attached file (test.xml) is the generated XMI file. It is using
>>>SPEM metamodel, but SPEM is derived from UML metamodel. The element
>>>"SPEM:A_behavior_contex" relates a WorkDefinition, which extends Operation,
>>>with an ActivityGraph (xmi.idref = "a7"). However, the ActivityGraph itself
>>>(xmiid = "a7") is not there! Do you have any other hints?
>>>
>>>      Thanks a lot!!!
>>>
>>>      Leo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Jaroslav Drazan [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 6:33 AM
>>>>To: [email protected]
>>>>Subject: Re: [mdr-users] Operation as a context of ActivityGraph
>>>>
>>>>Hello Leo,
>>>>You can't set the composition more than once. That's the reason why all
>>>>compositions defined by UML (ModelElement in Namespace, Feature in
>>>>Classifier...) are optional (multiplicity is 0..1). So if you want to
>>>>specify ActivityGraph for some BehaviorFeature you mustn't specify its
>>>>namespace (if it has been already set you must first set it to null).
>>>>
>>>>Regards
>>>>Jarda
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>>    I am using UML metamodel and trying to set the context of an
>>>>>ActivityGraph to an Operation. The specification says the context of an
>>>>>ActivityGraph may be a BehavioralFeature. Moreover, Operation inherits
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>from
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>BehavioralFeature. However, a CompositionViolationException is thrown.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>It
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>complains that I am trying to set more than one context to the
>>>>>ActivityGraph. I suppose it considers the namespace where the
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>ActivityGraph
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>is inserted as an existing context. Am I doing something wrong? What is
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>the
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>correct way to set the context of an ActivityGraph to an Operation?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>Where
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>should I insert the ActivityGraph to avoid the
>>>>>CompositionViolationException?
>>>>>
>>>>>    Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>    Leo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>____________________________________________________________
>>>>http://www.listicka.cz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>    
>>