Re: build targets or build outputs

Petr Jiricka wrote:
> 
> I think the related question is what should we call the Output node
> itself. Am I the only one who thinks that Output is not the best name,
> or would other people like to change it as well ?
> 
> My favorite alternative is "Building & Deployment".
> 
> Petr

I agree that the naming convention may not be the best. Since the "Output" node
contains targets maybe we should change the name to Targets. 

Chris


> 
> John Jullion-Ceccarelli wrote:
> 
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Simple (?) question: what do we call those things that go under the
> > Outputs node? Are they build targets or build outputs. I personally
> > prefer to talk about build targets as the nodes under the Output node
> > (the thing that produces your compiled classes, JARs, etc.) and the
> > build outputs as the things they produce (compiled classes, JARs, etc.)
> > Also, Ant users will find this familiar.
> >
> > Anyway, we need to decide on one term and use it everywhere.
> >
> > -John
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

-- 
         ______
        /_____/\             Christopher B. Webster        
       /____ \\ \            Member of Technical Staff
      /_____\ \\ /           
     /_____/ \/ / /          Sun Microsystems, Inc.
    /_____/ /   \//\         
    \_____\//\   / /         
     \_____/ / /\ /          
      \_____/ \\ \           
       \_____\ \\           
        \_____\/