Re: build targets or build outputs
cL <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.modules.projects.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
the problem i have with building & deployment is that it seems people are thinking of deployment as tied to profiles so at least half of your description doesn't directly apply and could be confusing. before we go off making little changes here and there to the names of things, lets test what we have and figure out what we *really* need to change to have successful users. cheers, cL Petr Jiricka wrote: > I think the related question is what should we call the Output node > itself. Am I the only one who thinks that Output is not the best name, > or would other people like to change it as well ? > > My favorite alternative is "Building & Deployment". > > Petr > > John Jullion-Ceccarelli wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> Simple (?) question: what do we call those things that go under the >> Outputs node? Are they build targets or build outputs. I personally >> prefer to talk about build targets as the nodes under the Output node >> (the thing that produces your compiled classes, JARs, etc.) and the >> build outputs as the things they produce (compiled classes, JARs, >> etc.) Also, Ant users will find this familiar. >> >> Anyway, we need to decide on one term and use it everywhere. >> >> -John >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- ui.netbeans.org interaction designer [email protected]