Re: A question about the New Java Project wizard

Ann Sunhachawee <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.netbeans.modules.projects.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
To get my 2c in before rework happens .. I disagree with consolidating 
the basic/empty with the project from existing sources. We would like 
our users to get through wizards as quickly as possible, and I think 
this distinction in templates is helpful up front.

This allows the user interested in starting a fresh project to start up 
quickly, without having to pause and understand the concept of "Java 
roots" or consider adding source or resource directories. If the user 
creates a empty/basic project and picks a project home that contains 
files, then perhaps we launch into Project from Existing Sources at that 
point if they confirm they indeed are trying to create a new project 
with those sources. The situation I'd like to avoid is that a user ends 
up with a hybrid project - part of their sources, with sample app files.

-ann

cL wrote:

> sure, this sound fine. the spec will get a major update after the 
> usability test results are compiled and analyzed and i will add this 
> to the bits that need to be re-worked.
>
> thanks,
> cL
>
> Petr Jiricka wrote:
>
>> Team,
>>
>> I have one question about creating new Java projects. According to 
>> the UI spec, there will be two wizards: one for new empty/basic 
>> project, and  one for project from existing sources. Well, is this 
>> really necessary ? Couldn't it work if there was just one wizard, 
>> which would decide which root to take, based on whether the home 
>> directory entered by the user already contains sources or not ?
>> The way it is now, the user needs to make the choice, when in fact 
>> the machine could make the choice for her. Another advantage would be 
>> that this would decrease the amount of clutter in the project 
>> selector UI.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Petr
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.