Re: A question about the New Java Project wizard
Ann Sunhachawee <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.modules.projects.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
To get my 2c in before rework happens .. I disagree with consolidating the basic/empty with the project from existing sources. We would like our users to get through wizards as quickly as possible, and I think this distinction in templates is helpful up front. This allows the user interested in starting a fresh project to start up quickly, without having to pause and understand the concept of "Java roots" or consider adding source or resource directories. If the user creates a empty/basic project and picks a project home that contains files, then perhaps we launch into Project from Existing Sources at that point if they confirm they indeed are trying to create a new project with those sources. The situation I'd like to avoid is that a user ends up with a hybrid project - part of their sources, with sample app files. -ann cL wrote: > sure, this sound fine. the spec will get a major update after the > usability test results are compiled and analyzed and i will add this > to the bits that need to be re-worked. > > thanks, > cL > > Petr Jiricka wrote: > >> Team, >> >> I have one question about creating new Java projects. According to >> the UI spec, there will be two wizards: one for new empty/basic >> project, and one for project from existing sources. Well, is this >> really necessary ? Couldn't it work if there was just one wizard, >> which would decide which root to take, based on whether the home >> directory entered by the user already contains sources or not ? >> The way it is now, the user needs to make the choice, when in fact >> the machine could make the choice for her. Another advantage would be >> that this would decrease the amount of clutter in the project >> selector UI. >> >> Thanks >> Petr >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >