Re: A question about the New Java Project wizard
Svata Dedic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.modules.projects.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | CollabNet Hosting |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ann Sunhachawee wrote: > To get my 2c in before rework happens .. I disagree with consolidating > the basic/empty with the project from existing sources. We would like > our users to get through wizards as quickly as possible, and I think > this distinction in templates is helpful up front. > Aha. So I imagine other technologies will match the java one: So there will probably be "Basic project", "Empty project", "From existing sources", "Basic RMI", "Empty RMI", "RMI from existing sources", "Basic CORBA", "Empty CORBA", "CORBA from existing sources", ... ? -Svata