Re: A question about the New Java Project wizard

Svata Dedic <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.netbeans.modules.projects.devel
Organization CollabNet Hosting
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ann Sunhachawee wrote:
> To get my 2c in before rework happens .. I disagree with consolidating 
> the basic/empty with the project from existing sources. We would like 
> our users to get through wizards as quickly as possible, and I think 
> this distinction in templates is helpful up front.
> 
Aha. So I imagine other technologies will match the java one:
So there will probably be "Basic project", "Empty project", "From 
existing sources", "Basic RMI", "Empty RMI", "RMI from existing 
sources", "Basic CORBA", "Empty CORBA", "CORBA from existing sources", ... ?

-Svata
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.