Re: why not merge that eclipse-perspective-lookalike and NB3.6-explorer tree ?
Tim Boudreau <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.user-interface |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
For navigating *inside* a class, you might find my "navigator" module useful. http://workspaceswitcher.netbeans.org/servlets/ProjectDownloadList -Tim Peter Buckenleib wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2004 15:22 schrieb Tor Norbye: > >>(b) each dir component would cause the files to scroll further to the >>right thus increasing the likelihood of horizontal scrollbars and >>either clipping the left or the right side of the display. E.g. rather >>than >> abc.foo.bar.baz >> MyJavaSourceFile1 >> MyJavaSourceFile2 >> I had >> abc >> foo >> bar >> baz >> MyJavaSourceFile1 >> MyJavaSourceFile2 > > That doesn't realy count. You have to scroll a too small window in tree-mode > and in flat mode, cause in both cases the interessting part is on the > rightmost place, and as far as i know there is no implementation that aligns > and scrolls a panel from right to left (except hebrew,arabian, or so). > A flat list of 30 identical items "abc.daf.gh....." is not that beautiful site > to look at. If you scroll the window to the rightmost place and longer names > show up as you scroll down, you have to scroll to the right again, and if you > have sourcefiles with identical names in different packages, your lost when > your flat list clips away the package name. > > >> (Notice also how the old behavior takes up a lot more vertical space!) > > just if you expand ALL nodes, but why would you do that? > Why do you want nodes under abc.foo.bar.baz to be epanded when you are working > in abc.foo.def.ghi? > Also if you have to work at abc.foo.abc.def.MyJavaSourceFile1 and > abc.foo.ghi.jkl.MyJavaSourceFile2 simultanously, you can collapse all the > nodes between, and have the interesting parts of your project as close > together as possible. In flat mode you have to scroll for miles in all 4 > directions or use another kind of navigation to go from a to b. But that is > another story. > > > >>typically I more often jump between methods in my files and that > > Why not use "goto source", goto implementation", or the new > "usage"-navigation? > regards > > Peter