Re: Matisse: using TableModelEditor in data-aware (real) applications
Wade Chandler <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.netbeans.user-interface |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
No. You mentioned the only UI editor support available. I just make them by hand. Wade --- Witold Szczerba <[email protected]> wrote: > That is good news what you say, I was reading > (rather browsing) this > JSR just while ago :) > However I cannot wait that long :( > Any idea how can I visually design JTables in > Matisse? > > > 2006/11/1, Wade Chandler > <[email protected]>: > > lol already working on it and yes Swing is within > the > > API check out: > > http://swinglabs.dev.java.net > > > > JDNC used to be the API you are talking about, and > it > > could be defined in markup. It is being abandoned > in > > favor of a new JSR see: > > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=296 > > > > Wade > > > > --- Witold Szczerba <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > I am writing simple GUI application with JPA. > Great > > > thing is that > > > Toplink and Derby are included in NB5.5 - > everything > > > you need is right > > > there out of the box :) > > > > > > In my data frame, there is JTable showing > records > > > from database. There > > > is nice table editor in Matisse, you can define > > > columns, but it seems > > > useless, because I have to override data model > > > anyway - my table is > > > loaded with data received from entity manager. > > > > > > Is there any way I could visually define my > table > > > columns and use this > > > after replacing data model? Now I have just > blank > > > rectangle because I > > > have to use my custom table model... it does not > > > seem to be the proper > > > way of using visual editor :( > > > > > > -josh > > > > > > p.s. > > > I think in the near future Swing should be > replaced > > > by some other API > > > for creating desktop applications. I think this > new > > > library/framework > > > could use Swing internally but it might be much > much > > > more declarative > > > (annotations!). Defining things like table > columns, > > > data sources and > > > binding could be finally resolved under one > umbrella > > > :) > > > > > >