Re: RE: Detecting finally blocks?

"Dave Brosius" <[email protected]> wrote on 17/12/2009 21:12:57:
>
> Are you sure of this? The later JDKs spew out horrible code to 
> handle catch/finally blocks, often repeating the catch/finally block
> mulitple times in byte code, even tho there is only one source level
> catch/finally block. It's amazing that the whole try/catch/finally 
> mechanism works the way the parser emits code.

Why would that be a bad thing? More repetitive bytecode sounds good to 
me - as it hopefully makes the life of the compiler that we really 
care about (y'know, the one that actually produces machine code) 
easier.

Thanks,

Ben
-- 
Ben Evans
eFX Algorithmic Trading
Deutsche Bank, London
Office: +44 (0)20 7541 3953




---

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.

Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.

-- 
You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws