gmane.comp.java.objectweb.asm

1659 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

ASM 9.9
Sun, 5 Oct 2025 15:25:00 +0200 (CEST)
"Remi Forax" ([email protected]) <[email protected]> • #5481
ASM 9.7.1 released
Mon, 7 Oct 2024 20:02:20 +0200
"Eric Bruneton" ([email protected]) <[email protected]> • #5480
Re: Method size in bytes
Sun, 2 Jun 2024 07:20:43 -0300
"Roberto Andrioli" ([email protected]) <[email protected]> • #5479
Method size in bytes
Sat, 1 Jun 2024 16:30:17 +0200
"Peter Rader" ([email protected]) <[email protected]> • #5478
Assert.assertFalse(Opcodes.V1_1< Opcodes.V22); // bug?
Sun, 7 Jan 2024 20:24:02 +0000 (UTC)
"Johan Parent" ([email protected]) <[email protected]> • #5477
Re: Unexpected data flow error with `CheckClassAdapter`
Thu, 20 Apr 2023 19:36:16 +0200
"ebruneton" ([email protected]) <[email protected]> • #5476
Unexpected data flow error with `CheckClassAdapter`
Tue, 18 Apr 2023 18:13:51 +0200 (CEST)
"\"Pascal Kesseli\"" ([email protected]) <[email protected]> • #5475
ASM 9.5
Sat, 25 Mar 2023 10:21:04 +0100 (CET)
"Remi Forax" ([email protected]) <[email protected]> • #5474
Re: [Question] How to map parameter annotations to corresponding parameters
Tue, 15 Nov 2022 19:56:04 +0100 (CET)
"Remi Forax" ([email protected]) <[email protected]> • #5473
[Question] How to map parameter annotations to corresponding parameters
Wed, 16 Nov 2022 02:29:26 +0800 (CST)
司 ([email protected]) <[email protected]> • #5472
[Question] How to map parameter annotations to corresponding parameters
Tue, 15 Nov 2022 19:33:38 +0100 (CET)
"\"sify21\"" ([email protected]) <[email protected]> • #5471
ASM 9.4 released
Sun, 02 Oct 2022 14:05:30 +0200
"ebruneton" ([email protected]) <[email protected]> • #5470
ASM 9.3 released !
Tue, 5 Apr 2022 08:17:24 +0200 (CEST)
"Remi Forax" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5469
ASM on .NET & C# hackish workaround
Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:11:51 +0100
"Gyorgy Kepes" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5468
Re: [External] : ASM 9.2 released
Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:55:58 -0400
"Vicente Romero" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5467
Re: [External] : ASM 9.2 released
Thu, 24 Mar 2022 19:47:47 +0100 (CET)
"Remi Forax" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5466
Re: [External] : ASM 9.2 released
Thu, 24 Mar 2022 12:06:36 -0400
"Vicente Romero" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5465
Re: NegativeArraySizeException merging frames during replaceAsmInstructions
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:33:53 +0100
"ebruneton" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5464
Re: NegativeArraySizeException merging frames during replaceAsmInstructions
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:15:09 +0100
Eirik Bjørsnøs (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5463
Re: NegativeArraySizeException merging frames during replaceAsmInstructions
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 14:32:26 +0100
"ebruneton" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5462
Re: NegativeArraySizeException merging frames during replaceAsmInstructions
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 12:50:52 +0100
Eirik Bjørsnøs (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5461
Re: NegativeArraySizeException merging frames during replaceAsmInstructions
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 11:40:09 +0100
"ebruneton" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5460
NegativeArraySizeException merging frames during replaceAsmInstructions
Wed, 16 Mar 2022 20:59:38 +0100
Eirik Bjørsnøs (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5459
ASM 9.2 released
Sat, 26 Jun 2021 17:56:56 +0200
"ebruneton" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5458
Minor changes to the JVM spec likely slated to Java 18
Sun, 6 Jun 2021 16:08:25 +0200 (CEST)
"Remi Forax" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5457
Re: JEP 306 - always strictfp semantics
Sat, 5 Jun 2021 13:18:34 +0200
"Eric Bruneton" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5456
Re: JEP 306 - always strictfp semantics
Thu, 3 Jun 2021 17:39:13 +0200 (CEST)
"forax" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5455
Re: How to find out if Remapper / ClassRemapper actually remapped anything?
Sat, 22 May 2021 13:03:42 +0200 (CEST)
"\"Alexander Kriegisch\"" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5454
Re: How to find out if Remapper / ClassRemapper actually remapped anything?
Sat, 22 May 2021 11:51:21 +0200
"ebruneton" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5453
How to find out if Remapper / ClassRemapper actually remapped anything?
Thu, 20 May 2021 05:41:43 +0200 (CEST)
"\"Alexander Kriegisch\"" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5452
How to find out if Remapper / ClassRemapper actually remapped anything?
Thu, 20 May 2021 05:42:24 +0200 (CEST)
"\"Alexander Kriegisch\"" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5451
Re: JEP 306 - always strictfp semantics
Thu, 13 May 2021 09:17:08 -0400
"Eugene Kuleshov" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5450
Re: JEP 306 - always strictfp semantics
Thu, 13 May 2021 15:05:13 +0200 (CEST)
"ebruneton" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5449
Re: JEP 306 - always strictfp semantics
Thu, 13 May 2021 08:53:34 -0400
"Eugene Kuleshov" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5448
Re: JEP 306 - always strictfp semantics
Thu, 13 May 2021 14:45:46 +0200 (CEST)
"ebruneton" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5447
Re: utf8 processing
Sun, 9 May 2021 11:10:23 -0400
"Eugene Kuleshov" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5446
Re: utf8 processing
Sun, 9 May 2021 16:23:41 +0200 (CEST)
"Remi Forax" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5445
Re: utf8 processing
Sun, 09 May 2021 13:52:10 +0000
"x4e_x4e" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5444
utf8 processing
Sun, 9 May 2021 09:44:32 -0400
"Eugene Kuleshov" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5443
Re: JEP 306 - always strictfp semantics
Fri, 7 May 2021 14:50:48 +0200 (CEST)
"forax" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5442
APM Agent Developer opportunity 21000B8P
Fri, 7 May 2021 05:29:21 -0700
"CS Pro" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5441
Re: JEP 306 - always strictfp semantics
Fri, 7 May 2021 08:09:24 -0400
"Eugene Kuleshov" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5440
Re: JEP 306 - always strictfp semantics
Fri, 7 May 2021 14:01:13 +0200 (CEST)
"forax" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5439
Re: JEP 306 - always strictfp semantics
Fri, 7 May 2021 07:46:27 -0400
"Eugene Kuleshov" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5438
JEP 306 - always strictfp semantics
Fri, 7 May 2021 12:14:01 +0200 (CEST)
"Remi Forax" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5437
Re: [Question] Could the max code size check be optional?
Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:01:15 +0000
"Manuel Carrasco" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5436
Re: [Question] Could the max code size check be optional?
Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:31:36 +0100
"ebruneton" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5435
Re: [Question] Could the max code size check be optional?
Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:02:43 -0400
"Eugene Kuleshov" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5434
Re: [Question] Could the max code size check be optional?
Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:26:57 +0000
"Manuel Carrasco" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5433
Re: [Question] Could the max code size check be optional?
Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:53:15 -0400
"Eugene Kuleshov" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> • #5432