Re: [Question] Could the max code size check be optional?
"Eugene Kuleshov" (via asm Mailing List) <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:53:15 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.objectweb.asm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADFjdoVYUg579ZwLpkaayeF795SYbZvgicZEMg9eSdD8wCh0Vw@mail.gmail.com> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1615992811-16935-14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Manuel, If your pipeline has some optimizer in the middle, perhaps you can write your generated bytecode into a MethodNode first, then run your optimizer over a MethodNode and only then send it to the MethodWriter regards, Eugene On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 7:10 AM Manuel Carrasco <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > How are you? > > I noticed that the MethodWriter currently (184aaa9f0ec4c233872087a3c4d2d9= 6a3c204ac6) throws an exception when the method size exceeds the maximum al= lowed by the JVM. The intent is clear to me, the library wants to emit Java= bytecode that is legal in terms of the specification. My question is, coul= d we make this check optional and true by default? > > In case that you want to perform an optimization to shrink your code, you= may require to have the max stack and local as well as the stack map frame= s available. So, you execute the ClassWriter to compute them, but it will c= rash as soon the MethodWriter verifies the maximum code size. > > The current implementation is limiting user optimizations on their code i= n case it has already exceeded the maximum limit. At least, it is not allow= ing them to compute the max stack and local as well as the map stack frames. > > I tested commenting the check and emitting the code. It didn't crash, and= I could optimize it, so it can be executed by the JVM. > > Considering all this, I'd like to know if you consider reasonable to make= the max code size check optional. Perhaps, I'm missing some other technica= l reason that could make this impossible. > > Thanks in advance! > > Cheers, > Manuel. > > > -- > You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. > To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] > For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=3Dhelp > OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws ------------=_1615992811-16935-14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws ------------=_1615992811-16935-14--