Re: generics in ASM
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.objectweb.asm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Joshua, ASM never been generified. The main reason is to maintain compatibility with Java 1.1. Perhaps it is now time to review that. Eg. one could use retrotranslator or retroweaver tools to run ASM on old JVMs. regards, Eugene On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Joshua Warner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > While reading through the documentation > (http://download.forge.objectweb.org/asm/asm-guide.pdf), I noticed a > discrepancy. In that document, it seems to indicate that the ListS in > ClassNode are generic, e.g List<MethodNode> (see pages 83-84). When looking > both the source code (SVN trunk) and the api documentation, I see that this > is not the case. > > Were these fields generic at the time the documentation was written? If so, > why were they changed back? If not, why not use generics? > > Regards, > Joshua
message-footer.txt
(text/plain, 238 B)
-- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws