Re: generics in ASM
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.objectweb.asm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ben Evans wrote: > OK, I'll bite. Why would anyone care about pre-1.5 compatibility > these days? Java 5 is EOL - it's dead, so why does it make sense to > ship anything with support for older versions of Java than 5? Because we can. :) Anyways, the only packages that exposing non-generified collections to the user API are asm.tree and asm.tree.analysis the rest is just internally used collections. Internally, in a few places, ASM breaks the rules of strongly-typed collections and storing different objects within the same collection and then using instanceof instead of virtual lookup. That stuff could be rewritten to be strongly typed, but that will likely increase an in-memory representation of the tree model. Anyways, performance impact should be compared for any code changes. regards, Eugene
message-footer.txt
(text/plain, 238 B)
-- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws