Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ASM 4 is ready ?
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.objectweb.asm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
08/01/2011 19:35, Rémi Forax wrote: >> still, the compiler manipulates strings representing >> class/method/field names and types in the script, not the real objects? > > yes, you're right. > But because the compiler and the runtime are interleaved, you will find > source files > that handles both java.dyn.MethodHandle and org.objectweb.asm.MethodHandle. can you give a concrete example where it is impossible to separate the compiler and the runtime parts in separate source files, each using either asm or java.dyn classes? For me the runtime part does not have to manipulate ASM classes. So the only problem would be if the compiler needs java.dyn classes to generate code. But I don't see examples. Also the compiler is likely to create MethodType and MethodHandle, but since the java.dyn classes do not have constructors, there is no risk of error here. Eric
message-footer.txt
(text/plain, 238 B)
-- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws