Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Release of ASM4

I guess I've not tried to move my code to ASM4 yet, but I would have 
assumed that if I'm doing limited transformations whereby I pass most 
constants, etc, through, that my visitor/adapter wouldn't have to change 
at all.

[I'm essentially just doing "around" advice like AspectJ, but without 
the overhead, etc, of AspectJ.]

On 8/5/2011 10:12 AM, Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
> Jess,
>
>    You will have to use ASM4 in order to process Java7 bytecode, even
> if you are not using Java7 features, new bytecode can have new
> constant types not supported by ASM3.
>
>    regards,
>    Eugene
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Jess Holle<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> I use ASM 3 with a non-mangled package name -- and use various other
>> packages which use it with a mangled package name.
>>
>> I can do a global replace and recompile easily enough, of course -- it's not
>> like I'm going to straddle ASM 3 and ASM 4 (i.e. trying to support either as
>> a drop-in).
>>
>> That said, since ASM 4 is required for proper Java 7 support, it seems like
>> repackaging now forces an update for anyone not mangling purely to get to
>> Java 7 support.  I'm not sure that's entirely a good thing -- but I won't
>> throw a fit about it either.
>>
>> --
>> Jess Holle
>>
>> On 8/4/2011 10:17 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
>>> Tapestry uses ASM 3 with a mangled package name as well.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
>>> <[email protected]>    wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Rémi Forax<[email protected]>    wrote:
>>>>> Hi Eugene,
>>>>> I know that you really want to change the package name
>>>>> but talking with several users at the JVM Summit last week,
>>>>> the idea is not popular.
>>>>> Most of them either manage their dependencies to have only
>>>>> jars that use one version of ASM (maven to the rescue)
>>>>> or they use jarjar.
>>>> Count JRuby among the projects that ships ASM under a mangled package
>>>> name. I don't care what the package is, really.
>>>>
>>>> BiteScript, on the other hand, does have dependencies on ASM's actual
>>>> package name and our mangled name. BiteScript is still used as the
>>>> compiler backend of a few projects.
>>>>
>>>> - Charlie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list.
>>>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
>>>> For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
>>>> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list.
>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
>> For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
>> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>>
>>

-- 
You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws