Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Release of ASM4
Jess Holle <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.objectweb.asm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/5/2011 12:22 PM, Rémi Forax wrote: > On 08/05/2011 05:41 PM, Jess Holle wrote: >> I guess I've not tried to move my code to ASM4 yet, but I would have >> assumed that if I'm doing limited transformations whereby I pass most >> constants, etc, through, that my visitor/adapter wouldn't have to >> change at all. >> >> [I'm essentially just doing "around" advice like AspectJ, but without >> the overhead, etc, of AspectJ.] > > BTW, you could implement "around" advice without generating any bytecode > using invokedynamic and MethodHandles.foldArguments(). > > see > http://code.google.com/p/jsr292-cookbook/source/browse/trunk/interceptors/src/jsr292/cookbook/interceptors/Interceptors.java Hmmmm..... I'll have to check that out -- when I can rely on Java 7. I'd still need ASM to intercept the call, though, right? -- Jess Holle
message-footer.txt
(text/plain, 238 B)
-- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws