Re: Re: Possible stack frame calc dead code bug again!
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.objectweb.asm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADFjdoU=2BUa-AS6YdcvDPfYyMPAF9ovTA-66Sj7hHrhBfZOXg@mail.gmail.com> |
Charlie, You ca just add asmifier visitor before or instead of classwriter into visitor chain. regards, Eugene On 2011-09-09 5:02 PM, "Charles Oliver Nutter" <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, I guess I'm not clear how to do that. How do I get ASMIfier to > dump something out before I turn it into bytes? > > - Charlie > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ok, I'll give it a try. >> >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:27 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> can you also give the ASMifier code to produce the class, so that we have the original bytecode (i.e. before ClassWriter replaces deadcode with NOPs)? >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: >>>> Hello everyone, it's your friendly neighborhood compiler writer who >>>> refuses to remove dead code! >>>> >>>> We have a similar case to the previous bug, though this one appears >>>> to >>>> only fail verification on Java 7...not on Java 6. >>>> >>>> The bytecode that fails is shown here: >>>> https://gist.github.com/8899f7b0c7f8cd741ef8 >>>> >>>> The error: >>>> >>>> Stack map does not match the one at exception handler 56 in method >>>> blah.block_0$RUBY$__file__(Lblah;Lorg/jruby/runtime/ThreadContext;Lorg/jruby/runtime/builtin/IRubyObject;Lorg/jruby/runtime/builtin/IRubyObject;Lorg/jruby/runtime/Block;)Lorg/jruby/runtime/builtin/IRubyObject; >>>> at offset 29 >>>> java.lang.VerifyError: Stack map does not match the one at exception >>>> handler 56 in method >>>> blah.block_0$RUBY$__file__(Lblah;Lorg/jruby/runtime/ThreadContext;Lorg/jruby/runtime/builtin/IRubyObject;Lorg/jruby/runtime/builtin/IRubyObject;Lorg/jruby/runtime/Block;)Lorg/jruby/runtime/builtin/IRubyObject; >>>> at offset 29 >>>> >>>> Other than the version number 51 in the class file, the same bytecode >>>> verifies on Java 6. Something got stricter in 7? Something broke? >>>> >>>> I've attached a zip containing the class file and the full output of >>>> dumping the entire class's bytecode. >>>> >>>> This is running on RC1ish (custom build). >>>> >>>> Help?! >>>> >>>> - Charlie >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing >>>> list. >>>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] >>>> For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help >>>> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws >>> >>
message-footer.txt
(text/plain, 238 B)
-- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws