Re: Re: Query about packaging extended analysis package
Andreas Sewe <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:33:55 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.objectweb.asm |
|---|---|
| Organization | Software Technology Group, TU Darmstadt |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 21.04.14 10:07, Eric Bruneton wrote: > 16/04/2014 00:32, Eliot Moss wrote: >> At present we are thinking that the best way to go is to offer >> this as a new subpackage under tree, say 'tree.analysis2'. It >> could also be done as, say, tree.analysis.extended or something. >> We solicit your input on this. > > Maybe tree.nanalysis (like java.nio vs java.io)? I don't have good ideas. tree.analysisng (like TestNG) perhaps? If you want to pronounce it "analysing" you can also shorten that to tree.analysng or tree.analyzng. Just my two cents. Andreas
message-footer.txt
(text/plain, 238 B)
-- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws