Re: ASM 5.2 ?

Rob Bygrave wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies if this is slightly off topic.
>
> /> jacoco/issues/177 <https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/issues/177>/
>
> With this issue I see the mention of
> ClassWriter.getCommonSuperClass(Unknown Source) ... and the issue of ASM
> needing to load classes to re-calculate the stack frames. As an ASM user
> (for Ebean ORM) I hit this issue a lot and we try to ensure the agent
> has access to the appropriate classpath such that it can load classes
> for ClassWriter.getCommonSuperClass().

The corresponding ASM bug (#317551, #317630) is fixed in the 5.2 release.

Eric

>
> Sometimes depending on the context (more specifically enhancement
> running as an IDE plugin for IDEA and Eclipse etc) it is hard to build
> and supply this classpath for the agent/enhancement.
>
> Is there a plan to remove this classpath requirement (ie. change the
> implementation of ClassWriter.getCommonSuperClass() such that it doesn't
> need the actual Classes) ?
>
> If there was that would be very welcome indeed and yes I'd love to see a
> 5.2 release with that change.
>
> Apologies if I have completely missed the topic here.
>
>
> Cheers, Rob.
>
>
> On 12 December 2016 at 03:53, Remi Forax <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Evgeny,
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         *De: *"Evgeny Mandrikov" <[email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>>
>         *À: *"“[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>”" <[email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>>
>         *Envoyé: *Samedi 10 Décembre 2016 01:22:24
>         *Objet: *[asm] ASM 5.2 ?
>
>         Hi ASM developers,
>         Seems that trunk accumulated quite some changes without further
>         activity for couple of months since ASM version 5.1.
>         And they are interesting for ASM consumers, in particular for
>         JaCoCo ( http://www.jacoco.org/jacoco/index.html
>         <http://www.jacoco.org/jacoco/index.html> ):
>         http://forge.ow2.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=317630&group_id=23&atid=100023
>         <http://forge.ow2.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=317630&group_id=23&atid=100023> for https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/issues/177
>         <https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/issues/177>
>         http://forge.ow2.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=317748&group_id=23&atid=100023
>         <http://forge.ow2.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=317748&group_id=23&atid=100023> for https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/issues/462
>         <https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/issues/462>
>         If my memory is correct, some are of an interest also for
>         ByteBuddy ( http://bytebuddy.net/ ) that is nowadays used by
>         Mockito ( http://mockito.org/ ) and Hibernate (
>         http://hibernate.org/ ).
>
>         I know that another thread discusses 6.0 alpha 2. While we can
>         test it (actually should and probably will), but it might be
>         hard (maybe even impossible) to ship into production release
>         with dependency on alpha version. Here I mostly think about
>         Eclipse projects that require addition of ASM into Eclipse
>         Orbit ( https://www.eclipse.org/orbit/
>         <https://www.eclipse.org/orbit/> ), in particular EclEmma (
>         https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.eclemma
>         <https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.eclemma> )
>         that transitively uses ASM via JaCoCo. Also seems that 6.0
>         branch does not contain some of the fixes that are present in
>         trunk, isn't it?
>
>
>     yes, some fixes from the trunk are not yet 'forward ported' to
>     ASM6_FUTURE branch.
>
>         So what do you think about release 5.2? Are there any plans?
>
>
>     I think it's a good idea.
>     Eric ?
>
>         If needed, then don't hesitate to ask for a help - for example
>         we (JaCoCo developers) can retest trunk and reach out developers
>         of ByteBuddy and Mockito to do the same. As well as promote 5.2
>         release to Eclipse Orbit.
>
>         Best regards,
>         Evgeny
>
>
>     Rémi
>
>
>
>
>         --
>         You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]> mailing list.
>         To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>
>         For general help: mailto:[email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>?subject=help
>         OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>
>
>
>     --
>     You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]> mailing list.
>     To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     For general help: mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>?subject=help
>     OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]
For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help
OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws