Re: Alpha 2 release of ASM 6
Gunnar Morling <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Apr 2017 23:12:48 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.objectweb.asm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADGJaX-kOrfh+F-X_59iSvn7QNS=qQycMPG6m=kQJf7QcB1VWw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Remi, Is there any update on the Alpha2 release of ASM 6? Also is there any inclination on supporting ASM 6 on Java 8? When the "Module-Name" header actually won't be supported, tooling like the one I'm working on will be the only way for library authors for mandating a Jigsaw module name, if they don't want to move to Java 9 yet. Hence being able to use ASM 6 on Java 8 would be great. Thanks for any update, --Gunnar 2017-03-24 10:05 GMT+01:00 Gunnar Morling <[email protected]>: > Hi Remi, > > Can the upcoming Alpha2 release of ASM 6 be used on Java 8? I.e. will > class files have version 52? > > If that's doable, that'd be very practical to add module-info.class > descriptors to libraries, also when building them on Java 8 (by > assembling them via ASM instead of compiling them with javac). > > The Maven plug-in I'm working on is already capable to do that (I'm > compiling ASM myself currently), it'd be great if it could be used on > Java 8. > > Thanks, > > --Gunnar > > > 2017-03-09 8:25 GMT+01:00 Gunnar Morling <[email protected]>: >> Hi Remi, >> >> Yes, that makes sense. Do you know when this change will be released >> in an OpenJDK build? I hope an ASM 6 alpha release could be done soon >> thereafter? >> >> Another (or rather, an additional) option would be to deploy snapshot >> releases, e.g. to https://oss.sonatype.org/. That way people could >> consume the latest nightly builds easily. It should also help you to >> get more feedback for the next version, at least from adventurous >> users :) >> >> Thanks, >> >> --Gunnar >> >> >> 2017-03-09 0:36 GMT+01:00 Remi Forax <[email protected]>: >>> Hi Gunnar, >>> >>> The osVersion of visitTarget will be removed soon, >>> the change is in the jigsaw/jake workspace but not yet in the jdk9 workspace. >>> >>> I don't think it's a good idea to release a version of ASM given this pending change, >>> so we will wait until this change is integrated in the jdk9. >>> >>> and i promise to never say again that the classfile format is now stable because usually 2 days after, someone will propose to change it :) >>> >>> regards, >>> Rémi >>> >>> ----- Mail original ----- >>>> De: "Gunnar Morling" <[email protected]> >>>> À: [email protected] >>>> Envoyé: Lundi 6 Mars 2017 08:34:39 >>>> Objet: [asm] Alpha 2 release of ASM 6 >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Would it be possible to put out an Alpha 2 release of ASM 6 based on >>>> Remi's latest work on the ASM_6_FUTURE branch? >>>> >>>> The one version of ASM 6 available in Maven Central, 6.0_ALPHA, >>>> apparently doesn't work with the most recent Java 9 builds. >>>> >>>> Thanks a lot for your consideration, >>>> >>>> --Gunnar >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. >>>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] >>>> For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help >>>> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. >>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] >>> For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help >>> OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws >>> -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws