RE: OSUser Status

I am also using the current CVS version in an environment that should go to
production in a few days.  The only issue that I have, which is so minor as
to not mention, is that rollbacks aren't automagically handled, which would
only be true if OSUser was XA compliant.  (I said I was being nitty, right?) 

I'd say use it.  The options you get between deployment and providers (i.e.
database, EJB, LDAP, etc.) far outweigh the costs of learning the system and
integrating it.

-b

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 5:42 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Opensymphony-developers] OSUser Status
> 
> 
> A number of people have tried/volunteered to design/implement 
> the next 
> major iteration, but AFAIK not much has come of it yet. I use the 
> current cvs version in a production environment, but it isn't very 
> actively developed at the moment.
> 
> On Friday, April 18, 2003, at 05:12 PM, Keith Elliott wrote:
> 
> > OSUser looks very interesting, but the docs are sparse and there 
> > appears to be no activity.
> >
> >  
> >
> > Do you know the status? Is anyone using it in production? 
> Is it being 
> > actively developed?
> >
> >  
> >
> > Many thanks!
> >
> >  
> >
> > ========================
> >
> > Keith Elliott
> >
> > NuRelm E-Business Software
> >
> > www.nurelm.com
> >
> > ========================
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf