Re: Re: [OSWF] Associating additional information to the Steps

I've done something exactly like this (adding comments to a step), and 
it's pretty simple. Just pass it in as an input and then put it in the 
propertyset, with a special key that uses the current step 
id/workflow/id/whatever, that allows you to identify the comment.

On Friday, April 25, 2003, at 06:04 PM, Aníbal Rojas wrote:

> I suposed that was the idea, but I don't see where are you getting the 
> Step
> from. Would yo share the code?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Aníbal
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 5:52 PM
> Subject: RE: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional
> information to the Steps
>
>
> I had to add this functionality to add comments to a step, talked to 
> Pat
> about it a while ago, but he didn't like the idea, basically added 
> another
> var called "step" that gets passed to the functions (post functions if 
> i
> recall), so that you can get at the recently created step info.
>
> Travis
>
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?An=EDbal_Rojas?= <[email protected]>
> Sent: 2003-04-25
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional 
> information
> to the Steps
>
> Hi,
>
>     Using OSWorkflow 2.5.0 from CVS, I need to associate _persistent_
> information to steps. I saw a previous dicussion ( Due Date feature ) 
> where
> Hani suggested to use the PropertySet inside a function to accomplish 
> this
> kind of behavior.
>
>     My question is, Do I know from wich Step (or Steps) I am coming 
> from in
> the Function, or the Steps where I am "going to"? I think I need this 
> In
> order to associate the Step with the Information.
>
>     The infomation I need to add is similar to the discussed in the 
> "Due
> Date" Thread, is a Comment or Justification, for the Action. Of course 
> we
> are trying to avoid the grow of the signature of methods adding this
> "message" parameter and reworking the whole AbstractWorkflow.
>
>     Regards,
>
> Aníbal Rojas
> [email protected]
> 58+212+242.66.62 / 43.79
> Fax: 58+212+243.68.09
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf