Re: Re: [OSWF] Associating additional information to the Steps

Thanks, I'll be checking it.

----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 6:09 PM
Subject: RE: [Opensymphony-developers] Re: [OSWF] Associating additional
information to the Steps


I submitted a patch a while back...

http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WF-137

Travis

---- Original Message ----
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?An=EDbal_Rojas?= <[email protected]>
Sent: 2003-04-25
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Opensymphony-developers] Re:  [OSWF] Associating additional
information to the Steps

I suposed that was the idea, but I don't see where are you getting the Step
from. Would yo share the code?

Thanks,

Aníbal

----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 5:52 PM
Subject: RE: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional
information to the Steps


I had to add this functionality to add comments to a step, talked to Pat
about it a while ago, but he didn't like the idea, basically added another
var called "step" that gets passed to the functions (post functions if i
recall), so that you can get at the recently created step info.

Travis

---- Original Message ----
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?An=EDbal_Rojas?= <[email protected]>
Sent: 2003-04-25
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional information
to the Steps

Hi,

    Using OSWorkflow 2.5.0 from CVS, I need to associate _persistent_
information to steps. I saw a previous dicussion ( Due Date feature ) where
Hani suggested to use the PropertySet inside a function to accomplish this
kind of behavior.

    My question is, Do I know from wich Step (or Steps) I am coming from in
the Function, or the Steps where I am "going to"? I think I need this In
order to associate the Step with the Information.

    The infomation I need to add is similar to the discussed in the "Due
Date" Thread, is a Comment or Justification, for the Action. Of course we
are trying to avoid the grow of the signature of methods adding this
"message" parameter and reworking the whole AbstractWorkflow.

    Regards,

Aníbal Rojas
[email protected]
58+212+242.66.62 / 43.79
Fax: 58+212+243.68.09



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers







-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers








-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf