Re: Re: [OSWF] Associating additional information to the Steps

I'm still planning on getting this added (in some way) to CVS.

-Pat

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Opensymphony-developers] Re: [OSWF] Associating additional
information to the Steps


> Thanks, I'll be checking it.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 6:09 PM
> Subject: RE: [Opensymphony-developers] Re: [OSWF] Associating additional
> information to the Steps
>
>
> I submitted a patch a while back...
>
> http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WF-137
>
> Travis
>
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?An=EDbal_Rojas?= <[email protected]>
> Sent: 2003-04-25
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Opensymphony-developers] Re:  [OSWF] Associating additional
> information to the Steps
>
> I suposed that was the idea, but I don't see where are you getting the
Step
> from. Would yo share the code?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Aníbal
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: "Aníbal Rojas" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 5:52 PM
> Subject: RE: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional
> information to the Steps
>
>
> I had to add this functionality to add comments to a step, talked to Pat
> about it a while ago, but he didn't like the idea, basically added another
> var called "step" that gets passed to the functions (post functions if i
> recall), so that you can get at the recently created step info.
>
> Travis
>
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?An=EDbal_Rojas?= <[email protected]>
> Sent: 2003-04-25
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Opensymphony-developers] [OSWF] Associating additional
information
> to the Steps
>
> Hi,
>
>     Using OSWorkflow 2.5.0 from CVS, I need to associate _persistent_
> information to steps. I saw a previous dicussion ( Due Date feature )
where
> Hani suggested to use the PropertySet inside a function to accomplish this
> kind of behavior.
>
>     My question is, Do I know from wich Step (or Steps) I am coming from
in
> the Function, or the Steps where I am "going to"? I think I need this In
> order to associate the Step with the Information.
>
>     The infomation I need to add is similar to the discussed in the "Due
> Date" Thread, is a Comment or Justification, for the Action. Of course we
> are trying to avoid the grow of the signature of methods adding this
> "message" parameter and reworking the whole AbstractWorkflow.
>
>     Regards,
>
> Aníbal Rojas
> [email protected]
> 58+212+242.66.62 / 43.79
> Fax: 58+212+243.68.09
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-developers



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf