Re: OSWorkflow: Questions about database design and HibernateWorkflowStore
"Nick Dellamaggiore" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.open-symphony.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
thanks for your wisdom and guidance. "Pat Lightbody" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:043201c31f34$b77f0060$63343680@moose... > > I noticed that you have a current table and a history table. I can't seem > > to figure out the need for a separate history table. If you just had a > > CUR_STEP table and the cross-reference table linking the steps together, I > > think that would be sufficient. You could query for only current steps by > > selecting all steps that have a null finish date. > > Yes, we did this for performance reasons. In some of my projects we had some > HUGE step tables, and since the most common access is only for current steps > it seemed to make sense. > > > I suppose having 2 tables keeps the size of the current step table down > and > > thus might have a minor performance improvement. But, I think this is > offset > > by the performance hit of having to do multiple inserts, deletes, updates > > and selects when transitioning the workflow ( ESPECIALLY if you're using > > OwnerOnlyCondition, which performs a select in a for loop!). With one > > table, you could gain a 50% boost in workflow transition performance. > > True... you can always write your own persistence store ;) > > > Second question... HibernateWorkflowStore. It doesn't look like it is > fully > > implemented yet. Also, the constructor takes in a Session object, but your > > StoreFactory can't pass args to the constructor... only via the init() > > method. I like Hibernate. Is any work being done in this area? > > We use HibernateWorkflowStore at work. The way to use it is to extends > AbstractWorkflow and override getPersistence(). > > -Pat > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. > Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge